On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 06:54:14PM -0800, Christian Seberino wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 02:50:22PM -0500, chris@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> Sorry to be pedantic. I don't want to make any mistakes... > >> > >> The NETINFO cell section of spec right *before* section 5 > >> refers reader to section 6.4 for details of NETINFO cell payload. > > > > Hi again Chris! > > > > NETINFO is from the draft for the next version of the Tor spec. It > > isn't in the current version. There may have been some confusinon > > about which version _was_ the current version: I've tried to clear > > that up. > > Hmmm. How soon will this NETINFO'd version be out? I have no idea; not until after 0.1.2.x is done. > I want to stay current > but I also want to work with existing Tor network. Perhaps best would be > to target the bleeding edge spec for starters and later make the > (hopefully few :) mods to make it operable in current network? Probably that's a bad idea; the v2 spec is a work in progress: it's completely unstable and unimplemented right now. When NETINFO cells _are_ implemented, for example, they probably won't work like tor-spec-v2.txt describes today. -- Nick Mathewson
Attachment:
pgpryAyuIMYfp.pgp
Description: PGP signature