[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-dev] Comparing Stem, metrics-lib, and zoossh
> What you could try, though, is extend Zoossh to parse tarballs rather
> than directories. This is more than 2 times faster in metrics-lib,
> and it doesn't clutter your hard disk with thousands or millions of
> tiny files.
For what it's worth processing tarballs rather than flat files made a
huge difference for Stem as well (tempted to say it was a 5x
improvement). Since you care so much about Zoossh's speed this could
be a great way to make it even faster. :)
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
- References:
- Re: [tor-dev] Comparing Stem, metrics-lib, and zoossh
- Re: [tor-dev] Comparing Stem, metrics-lib, and zoossh
- Re: [tor-dev] Comparing Stem, metrics-lib, and zoossh
- Re: [tor-dev] Comparing Stem, metrics-lib, and zoossh
- Re: [tor-dev] Comparing Stem, metrics-lib, and zoossh
- Re: [tor-dev] Comparing Stem, metrics-lib, and zoossh
- Re: [tor-dev] Comparing Stem, metrics-lib, and zoossh
- Re: [tor-dev] Comparing Stem, metrics-lib, and zoossh
- Re: [tor-dev] Comparing Stem, metrics-lib, and zoossh