[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-dev] Notes from 1st Tor proposal reading group [prop241, prop247, prop259]




On 20 Jan 2016, at 07:41, George Kadianakis <desnacked@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

- prop259: The original guardset should also include 80/443 bridges (shouldn't
 have disjoint utopic/dystopic guard sets). We should specify a behavior on
 how the fascist firewall heuristic should work.

I wish I was there, but it was after midnight my time, soâ

I'm currently working on #17840, which adds IPv6 client support to tor using the fascist firewall checks.
IPv6-only clients also have restricted guard choices, much like clients which can only use 80/443.
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/17840

See also #17849, where yawning and I discuss logging a warning if clients have very restricted guard choices.
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/17849

Tim

Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP 968F094B

teor at blah dot im
OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev