On 11/11/13 15:40, Roger Dingledine wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 02:42:24PM +0000, Ximin Luo wrote: >> Whilst we're on that topic, labelling the final link from the exit node >> to the destination as "unencrypted" is unnecessarily scary as well Perhaps >> we could reword it to "encrypted if destination service is encrypted" >> and the other links to "always-encrypted". > > Great point. > > But applying the word 'encrypted' for both Tor's crypto and the horrible > web CA model makes me itch. > > How about "Encrypted by Tor" / "Not encrypted by Tor"? > > With pointers in the text to > https://www.eff.org/pages/tor-and-https > and > https://svn.torproject.org/svn/projects/articles/circumvention-features.html#7 > > --Roger > That sounds good! More precise than my last suggestion. -- GPG: 4096R/1318EFAC5FBBDBCE git://github.com/infinity0/pubkeys.git
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev