[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

[tor-relays] Relay behind firewall

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [tor-relays] Relay behind firewall
From: tagnaq <tagnaq@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:05:19 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:05:45 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GEfzQZtEPpE82mfhm7662Z5VoqKcBircfai64+MxngI=; b=Y1IcCDdXUUTLbF1s3QuX/VmKKkB/G1NyxbO7Fgh4q3urCkV8JMlNCQzOnkFjX8H0op CNd7+9PyPJRC9kDSXZE+Nr7bKXnK98D9KvBBASiDegSGpyh01HZQZc2RXtaJCbrzfUTm //6OVR1Xl1d8xK/fGvMBAkftps3PmUR5Rdym4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Z1KaO7Cl2IZ/TNpeyAk19AyyWJREktiTYQN7Wyb92fwmu9/jiBa5ERsDtjCmmEwMGK VEBn3MUF/eZgc2WQIVP1g7iHcQrzW4aupcZ/HgqMwbJ7ROEtHhElIRHAM4gZ9RHdyCDl MzTxq5yiESIXxDkWiEv3pwChssJNNcK89tIWE=
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "This mailing list is for support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)." <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi,

is there a way to properly configure a relay (ORPort reachable) that has
full internet access beside outgoing destination port 80 that will
properly work?

Problems: publishing descriptor to authorities that use that port,
clients are not aware of this restriction of a relay and will try to
build circuits where $nextrelay uses ORPort 80 -> circuit will fail
(currently 28 relays use ORPort 80)

I guess one should simply not bother trying to run a relay in such a
scenario. Is my assumption correct?

thanks,
tagnaq
ps: FascistFirewall is for clients only
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF4EAREKAAYFAk25Zg4ACgkQyM26BSNOM7YjMQEAlldmzhXeGbaar0tT0Qvyh3b+
b4cOSdVU3+x1iBPujqcA/0UiLBmGloriq5DJNOqXWQdO9dKIjOxW2zdewiTyNRm/
=sxNK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] Relay behind firewall
  - From: Robert Ransom

Prev by Author: [tor-relays] Persistent XSS vulnerability in TorStatus
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Request for help - Tor legal FAQ
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] DMCA notices in Canada?
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Relay behind firewall
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread