> On 29 Apr 2015, at 22:00 , tor-relays-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 17:45:44 +0200 > From: yl <tor@xxxxx> > > Am 28.04.2015 um 03:30 schrieb syndikal: >> let's begin: is it possible to run 5 bridges on one low-end VPS? each >> bridge would be hosted on a different IP address from five different /24 >> IP blocks, so that's not an issue. would i have to use multiple Tor >> processes, and would 5 processes be too much for a 2-core VPS with >> 256mb memory? >> >> also, how much bandwidth does a bridge normally burn through per month? >> on said VPS, the economical choice is to provide 200gb bandwidth per >> month. if that is not sufficient, the offer isn't financially feasible. > > I run a tor relay on some Atom processor, the bottleneck is the missing > AES-NI I think, however on 100MBit/s it only makes 35MBit/s with one CPU > core being loaded 100% and the other 3 at ~10%. My relay makes a few > TB/month like that, so I guess it is still good to keep it running. yl, have you tried running a second tor instance on another pair of ports? (onion / directory) The second instance would be able to use another of the processors on your multiprocessor machine. (Unfortunately, tor multithreading only offloads some of the work.) There is currently a limit of two instances per IP address, but if you have 2 IP addresses, you could potentially run 4 instances, one instance per processor. teor teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp 0xABFED1AC https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5 teor at blah dot im OTR D5BE4EC2 255D7585 F3874930 DB130265 7C9EBBC7
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays