[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Call for discussion: turning funding into more exit relays

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Call for discussion: turning funding into more exit relays
From: grarpamp <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 00:04:34 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:03:57 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=TAgml5WTzGTJ6isElxgefIkotsg7ig0ALNzuup+17q4=; b=LvIspG0qCx3MeR1XQuPAfLBIAaRmWNKeuqxxUnGLD71NOCy+Fn/+/nEON6Ipk9pVhm XGUWRV0ZxHfkSIbx8nFdNh4S8g5hpxuSVZQJtx9mcDzje7dlnhLv7KNEBSkGj1PDQnsR m25wmCfNbpH572i2N1j2PIRyGY8vnCqiN7OgMGMmh5rDKFrk21oeB7+05Q9ZwGpznTfd bnba3miNgGArKBpRXObi0BEjy1ZBh9+BkGPunKpmYhrM/aGm8MN1T2Mzj3GZBW0N2ssq e99008fUVXdItRSuTzJAyJ8YzmiyS/0V20AgEakktJu19oEjLCf+cHM7uHzqgiB2zfJH DFRg==
In-reply-to: <20120801001442.GI5916@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1343318473.00856126@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120801001442.GI5916@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

>> Is there any justification for a low-bandwidth Tor node?

Other than the diversity of having more nodes around...
seems from discussions here that slower nodes see less
users. Which means they're not as likely to be blocked
by content providers for user misbehavior. This can be
valuable for the legit users who manually pick slower nodes
to see if they can get through.
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] How to protect yourself from network scanning
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Help the Tor Project by running a fast unpublished bridge
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] [tor-assistants] Call for discussion: turning funding into more exit relays
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Call for discussion: turning funding into more exit relays
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread