On Wed, 07 Aug 2013 22:28:59 +0200 Moritz Bartl <moritz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 07.08.2013 22:11, Steve Snyder wrote: > > Given plenty of RAM, a muti-core CPU and a single IP address, which is > > more efficient: > > > > a single instance of Tor configured with "NumCPUs 2" or 2 instances of > > Tor configured with "NumCPUs 1" and different port numbers? > > Tor does not scale well across multiple cores. If you hit a single core > limit, you will have to spin up more processes. NumCPU does not help much. While we are on this topic, is there a limit on the number of nodes per IP address? I have two nodes running on one IP (different ports), tried adding a third one, but it can't seem to be able to register: Aug 06 22:39:27.000 [notice] Heartbeat: It seems like we are not in the cached consensus. Aug 06 22:39:27.000 [notice] Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 2 days 11:57 hours, with 0 circuits open. I've sent 11.38 MB and received 59.12 MB. Aug 06 23:06:22.000 [notice] Tor has successfully opened a circuit. Looks like client functionality is working. Aug 06 23:06:25.000 [notice] Performing bandwidth self-test...done. Aug 07 04:39:27.000 [notice] Heartbeat: It seems like we are not in the cached consensus. Aug 07 04:39:27.000 [notice] Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 2 days 17:57 hours, with 0 circuits open. I've sent 12.87 MB and received 64.58 MB. and this just goes on forever. -- With respect, Roman
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays