On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 08:45:33 -0500 a432511 <a432511@xxxxxxxxxx> allegedly wrote: > > I just spun up 2 relays (1 exit, 1 non-exit) in Amsterdam using > DigitalOcean as the VPS provider. It's been up for about 8 hours now. > Here was the message I sent to them regarding the servers: > I have three DigitalOcean VMs. One in Amsterdam is a (non-exit) relay (https://baldric.net/2013/01/13/what-a-difference-a-gig-makes/), the other two, in SanFrancisco and NYC, are tails mirrors. /Before/ starting the tor relay I specifically asked DO if they had any problems with tor. They told me much what they have apparently told you. Certainly I gained the impression that they would not be happy if their IP addresses appeared in abuse complaints. (https://www.digitalocean.com/community/questions/tor) I followed up that conversation in a support ticket and they have been fine with me running a relay ever since. > > The other thing that I am weighing is just a moral question regarding > misuse of the Tor network for despicable things like child porn. I > understand that of all the traffic it is a small percentage and that > ISPs essentially face the same dilemma, but I wonder if more can be > done to make Tor resistant to evil usage. > Tor is neutral. You and I may agree that certain usage is unwelcome, even abhorrent, but we cannot dictate how others may use an anonymising service we agree to provide. If you have a problem with that, you probably should not be running a tor node. Best Mick --------------------------------------------------------------------- Mick Morgan gpg fingerprint: FC23 3338 F664 5E66 876B 72C0 0A1F E60B 5BAD D312 http://baldric.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays