Re: [tor-relays] new relays

[tor@xxxxxxx]

This thread did go goofy and bad (and off-topic, given the subject in the emails). It seems clear that there are important reasons Tor could never begin examining/taking direct responsibility for/filtering the content that flows through it (as opposed with disallowing specific ports, which is different). Asking for this seems naive.

 

On Saturday 31/08/2013 at 8:54 am, Steve Snyder wrote:

On 08/30/2013 08:05 PM, Andrea Shepard wrote:
[snip]

If I were going to work on filtering by technical means, it'd be filters to
keep neo-Puritans like you out of my life, thanks.

Well said. This whole thread is example 87653478965432 of the
"censorship is A-OK if I don't like it" mindset.

Maybe we need a competitor to Tor, a privacy network that only allows
pictures of cute kittens and puppies as traffic.
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays