[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Debugging my small relay

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Debugging my small relay
From: Green Dream <greendream848@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 21:26:14 -0800
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:26:26 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=xDMh3wa4PK+zEY1wNGBLqK6o+Yhsvo6aRAfRm3m5r3A=; b=oluQYy1Hdy9c2U+X7xPXtLfQcSJtcXn9CcjVGw1b0tQcl/bSIfz3QTGUhAKDE9Ln0H JT7pgpuEVNZISPcApXqCUKm/cd7oD9zYbuhVw5JEPHngn283iZqI08zjroQLu90bajD7 aqdCkGidp/Rd92EckfStNHpUvDuth7m1jwbGquOULfYys1aKOcspnVL9CRgvD+MCBzb/ 4g9yByMYYFrkcF5JRurYJU/ndmZdI72JcSRNB8Pmeu7dFnRB3vPsFwC7m+h7SsTQ0Ug+ 37SrFebeK7AP6g7aPNn6FYGRMlLvAcdwpEoeMjxAFgHwrxcNk4zpCNQzgm27fs8FKCxk tVkA==
In-reply-to: <568D7817.9080203@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <568D2E95.8020403@xxxxxxxxxxx> <568D698D.2040307@xxxxxxxxxx> <568D72DF.903@xxxxxxxxxxx> <568D7817.9080203@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Is there really a reason to continue running this relay, even as a bridge? It has a consensus weight of 9. Before the upgrade and subsequent fingerprint reset, it was only at cw 16. The mean middle probability fraction wasÂ0.000103%. The mean on the read/write was less than half a kilobyte per second. It's not really being used.

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] Debugging my small relay
  - From: Tim Wilson-Brown - teor

References:
- [tor-relays] Debugging my small relay
  - From: Markus Hitter
- Re: [tor-relays] Debugging my small relay
  - From: Jesse V
- Re: [tor-relays] Debugging my small relay
  - From: Markus Hitter
- Re: [tor-relays] Debugging my small relay
  - From: Jesse V

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Should Onionoo consider relays with the same ip# to be part of the same family?
Next by Author: [tor-relays] DDoS attack on relay
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Debugging my small relay
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Debugging my small relay
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread