[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Should Onionoo consider relays with the same ip# to be part of the same family?

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Should Onionoo consider relays with the same ip# to be part of the same family?
From: grarpamp <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 02:19:53 -0500
Cc: metrics-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 02:20:44 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=o8eycTiMlmEjIRUn4MACrG2qAoXHQ9YWO1Ux2Ey9SrQ=; b=citFPM1pYFR5wzhwk2YaNuOkNP9wOKiky+5z6sdiqmwcF8gN7JA6snOFUk2Po5TeJ9 gE0FD40OphTj5JD1GsRIpDT/EX2IzfW8vpi6UU4gv37JnYKVaxwqLHgu0a3sAOkVQOgA zqyvSo1cyG2rDBN/N1tEgx/yCUkfmWAjCJQCuNdruUDi3v6YYsZbqzD+zxj5udlO4jgk qIxcTISbEId7KO22NKs6ss7ZbAs8b93HAXnN5bZcjGiIqYs30FYkvCVAgyP3CACtlG9s j186tzO7Tflx7DeR2tgrMJ7uHHDrfMA1kHm2bXJM27hxjoNVyFvUHwEUKWgrpY6xH/yq 31UA==
In-reply-to: <CADop2NGofPQjJJy0bKEeh0n50RQ3nCAFT2_XngxCgv62AkuHRA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CADop2NGofPQjJJy0bKEeh0n50RQ3nCAFT2_XngxCgv62AkuHRA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Virgil Griffith <i@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> No wrong answer---just wondering what is the community's vibe on this
> issue.  I can go either way.

Same IP excepting NAT is same box, kind of pointless if
they're not the same entity [1], err to caution and call it family,
put them in touch or encourage one or both to move or shutdown.

[1] Same entity would make sense if it was that entities
chosen / available way of binding multiple cpu cores to
tor instances, at least as far as the daemons go without
considering overall utility to tor.
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] Should Onionoo consider relays with the same ip# to be part of the same family?
  - From: Tim Wilson-Brown - teor

References:
- [tor-relays] Should Onionoo consider relays with the same ip# to be part of the same family?
  - From: Virgil Griffith

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] [tor-dev] How many exits exit from an IP address different than their OR address? (10.7%)
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Debugging my small relay
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Should Onionoo consider relays with the same ip# to be part of the same family?
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Should Onionoo consider relays with the same ip# to be part of the same family?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread