[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Uptime missing from Arm



I just use webmin and cluster all relays - it has uptime monitors and various alerts you can set - the cluster cron job is useful for regular updating and clearing house plus executing one off commands on all servers e.g. Updating myfamily row 

Vnstat for stats and graphs although cactus is a good tool also 

Easier than Zabbix...

Cheers
Mark B
Snaptor.co.uk (non commercial)


> On 9 Jan 2017, at 10:08, mistral.relay@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> Just to confirm - I see the same issue (Debian). So arm is only partially useful (not being really reliable) but I think it's not maintained anymore (?). I was looking into theonionbox for status reporting but that one also needs further development before becoming a reliable tool for monitoring...
> 
> 
> 
> Am 09.01.2017 10:27 schrieb Norman Rieß:
>> Same on plain old Debian.
>> Norman
>>> Am 08.01.2017 um 21:34 schrieb Alan:
>>> Yes I have this exact problem aswell
>>>> I have a similar problem,
>>>> arm does not show uptime and the average bandwidth rate is way to high.
>>>> When I start arm I get a log entry that looks like this:
>>>> "20:37:54 [ARM_NOTICE] Read the last day of bandwidth history from the
>>>> state file (21 minutes is missing)"
>>>> The time varies, sometimes it is even negative.
>>>> The operation system is Fedora 25, with arm 1.4.5.0
>>>> Greetings,
>>>> Simon Fischer.
>>>>> On Sun, 2017-01-08 at 10:47 -0800, Damian Johnson wrote:
>>>>> Hi Alan, what linux distribution is this with? The only platform I'm
>>>>> aware of having issues with the uptime is OpenBSD. This is because
>>>>> the
>>>>> uptime requires parsing ps output and on that sole platform they show
>>>>> it in 12-hour local time with am/pm indicators, and a format that
>>>>> shifts if over a day (ie. a true parsing pita :P).
>>>>> Cheers! -Damian
>>>>>> On 1/8/17, Alan <tor-relay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>> I have 3 relays running but on Arm only one shows the uptime. Also
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> Averages it keeps are way off.
>>>>>> Alan.
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> tor-relays mailing list
>>>>> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays_______________________________________________
>>>> tor-relays mailing list
>>>> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> tor-relays mailing list
>>> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>> _______________________________________________
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays