[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Simplifying ExoneraTor


On Sun, Jul 5, 2015, at 02:26 PM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 05/07/15 14:20, teor wrote:
> > 
> >> On 5 Jul 2015, at 19:37 , Karsten Loesing
> >> <karsten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> Actually, how about we use the same definition as for the Exit flag?
> 
> Even if a relay without the Exit flag could have possibly been used as
> an exit, the probability for clients to choose it is quite low.

 Is that probability the same for a malicious actor though (who may have
 set up the relay themselves)?
GD

-- 
http://www.fastmail.com - A fast, anti-spam email service.

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays