[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-relays] Simplifying ExoneraTor
Karsten wrote:
>
> Anyway, I guess what I'm trying to say is that this is not an exact
> science and there's no clearly right way to say that a relay is an
> exit or not. We should pick a definition that's plausible to mere
> mortals, and that could be:
>
> a) whether the relay has the Exit flag,
> b) whether the relay permitted exiting to "web ports" 80 or 443,
> c) whether the relay permitted exiting to any port at all, etc.
>
> I think a) is better than b). But do you think c) would be even
> better than that?
>
From the perspective of someone investigating abuse, I think it's
important that 'not an exit relay' means 'not capable of exiting on any
port at all'. Ergo I think your option c) is the way to go.
Regards,
Geoff
--
http://www.fastmail.com - Same, same, but different...
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays