[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] wubthecaptain1 relay is no longer an exit

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] wubthecaptain1 relay is no longer an exit
From: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 21:58:45 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:59:00 -0400
In-reply-to: <20160712192940.GA9340@partyvan.eu>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20160712192940.GA9340@partyvan.eu>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 07/12/2016 09:29 PM, Juuso Lapinlampi wrote:
> They would have allowed me to continue having an exit on ports 80 and
> 443, but I didn't see that to do much good so I've turned my relay into
> a middle relay
Why ?
And didn't you consider to run an exit w/ minimal # of exit ports (eg. 443 and 6667) and then open step by step few more of those listened hre:
 https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy ?

IMO it is not necessary to open all 65535 ports, 1 or 2 dozen are enough to cover a majority of the needs of the users.

- -- 
Toralf
PGP: C4EACDDE 0076E94E, OTR: 420E74C8 30246EE7
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iF4EAREIAAYFAleFS/UACgkQxOrN3gB26U6hfgD/dIRRwKG3HOV5t1OO0coygbob
dWEQe/xn49In8dhj6YkA/AxvedZTMq/Xm2ssjdNVyGH6tb1CANZjrD6T2mrOvrQ5
=f7dm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] wubthecaptain1 relay is no longer an exit
  - From: Markus Koch

References:
- [tor-relays] wubthecaptain1 relay is no longer an exit (was: Re: Exit node situation in Finland)
  - From: Juuso Lapinlampi

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] obfs4 - git how to ?
Next by Author: [tor-relays] which DirPort should be advertised ?
Previous by thread: [tor-relays] wubthecaptain1 relay is no longer an exit (was: Re: Exit node situation in Finland)
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] wubthecaptain1 relay is no longer an exit
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread