Re: [tor-relays] wubthecaptain1 relay is no longer an exit

[Markus Koch <niftybunny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

running 3 exit nodes with HTTP + HTTPS (niftymouse,niftygerbil and
niftyguineapig) on cheap VPSs and can confirm: There are heavily used
and meaningful. Even with only HTTP + HTTPS. I got 12 abuse mails ...
so you wont get rid of this issue but I will be way less. Please think
about using less ports.

Markus



2016-07-12 21:58 GMT+02:00 Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@xxxxxx>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 07/12/2016 09:29 PM, Juuso Lapinlampi wrote:
>> They would have allowed me to continue having an exit on ports 80 and
>> 443, but I didn't see that to do much good so I've turned my relay into
>> a middle relay
> Why ?
> And didn't you consider to run an exit w/ minimal # of exit ports (eg. 443 and 6667) and then open step by step few more of those listened hre:
>  https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy ?
>
> IMO it is not necessary to open all 65535 ports, 1 or 2 dozen are enough to cover a majority of the needs of the users.
>
> - --
> Toralf
> PGP: C4EACDDE 0076E94E, OTR: 420E74C8 30246EE7
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
>
> iF4EAREIAAYFAleFS/UACgkQxOrN3gB26U6hfgD/dIRRwKG3HOV5t1OO0coygbob
> dWEQe/xn49In8dhj6YkA/AxvedZTMq/Xm2ssjdNVyGH6tb1CANZjrD6T2mrOvrQ5
> =f7dm
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays