[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Exit policy question

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Exit policy question
From: Jesus Cea <jcea@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:45:29 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 08:52:26 -0400
In-reply-to: <2462C2A3-B186-4ABD-85D4-49C3772C9705@xxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "This mailing list is for support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)." <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <B243443DF316414B99208874D2E409240362EF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2462C2A3-B186-4ABD-85D4-49C3772C9705@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.18pre) Gecko/20110602 Lanikai/3.1.11pre

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/06/11 21:16, Justin Aplin wrote:

> Most people on this list seem to have a lot of success with the
> "standard" reduced exit policy (6 of [1]). Generally even ISPs who are
> hostile to Tor will give you several warnings before shutting down
> service, so if reasoning with them doesn't work, you always have the
> option of dropping down to a middle node later on down the line.

I run a TOR node in OVH (France). They shutdown my server several times
because it was "hacked" in the sense of "we don't think a server should
make outgoing port 443 connections". After a lof of complains and
arguments, and a dozen of shutdowns, I restricted my node to NON-EXIT.
And filter my 443 outgoing at FW level, because even connecting to port
443 of other TOR nodes were considered "you have a compromised machine".

Unsatisfying. But at least I provide 50Mbps to TOR mesh, 24x7, as an
internal relay node. Could be worse, I guess.

- -- 
Jesus Cea Avion                         _/_/      _/_/_/        _/_/_/
jcea@xxxxxxx - http://www.jcea.es/     _/_/    _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/
jabber / xmpp:jcea@xxxxxxxxxx         _/_/    _/_/          _/_/_/_/_/
.                              _/_/  _/_/    _/_/          _/_/  _/_/
"Things are not so easy"      _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/
"My name is Dump, Core Dump"   _/_/_/        _/_/_/      _/_/  _/_/
"El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQCVAwUBTejXaZlgi5GaxT1NAQJUZAP7BTOhSkFLIr1+ZrRwMaYhsGFkOCb5VRKn
UUTu1WMG6o/6Vm1AZBRTp9/PtldnWTVsmC6foM1U5nHtGfbgJfy6oLqXTTqegd6Z
ZV8u4x+e0w+MlWq0mZxahyGMqWt0MvIb3gRXuP47SvBjoJQVflevTF8lkGAOXCQr
2l27ehta/CY=
=jmq+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] Exit policy question
  - From: Sven Olaf Kamphuis
- Re: [tor-relays] Exit policy question
  - From: tagnaq
- Re: [tor-relays] Exit policy question
  - From: tagnaq

References:
- [tor-relays] Exit policy question
  - From: George Gemelos
- Re: [tor-relays] Exit policy question
  - From: Justin Aplin

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Exit policy question
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Exit policy question
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Exit policy question
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Exit policy question
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread