[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Exit policy question

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Exit policy question
From: tagnaq <tagnaq@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:49:38 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 10:49:47 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XTxn55zZqp2NO+YA5ttoC7gjUgug5CJUyr6FPFcbaxw=; b=wreBOfpSnzasyAJ0Vb2i+DlpF+cQGSL5VT+RnG9yqzJB//iEgpyU4nXrYxMmAJOXOd zOLXiTuvtV+SMGqGIrMOCn5fp+XAR7VCn0HqrgLlJqa6c1mdoAIJvpAQpfGulYruzQVe fR20knu/3HH2jhaS3PFTZZrs9+z7AXsl1Vle4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=AA0bwuKIn/lLAe4WCXSec/+abHdBTKqCiCZgvZ64GkWTDTIg5sj2DbIGBjfla4SyFZ GfFziGEMojTMK5xIT2DYTTQwWmPEdldjkOBwFbHfMqm9YEqU+Z1el2NlLFCj81q7oYi0 bCdr6T4/WXA+q4A27lbcHOhO+zMmOkOlg4+cs=
In-reply-to: <4DE8D769.80408@xxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "This mailing list is for support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)." <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <B243443DF316414B99208874D2E409240362EF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2462C2A3-B186-4ABD-85D4-49C3772C9705@xxxxxxxxx> <4DE8D769.80408@xxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 06/03/2011 02:45 PM, Jesus Cea wrote:
> I run a TOR node in OVH (France). They shutdown my server several times
> because it was "hacked" in the sense of "we don't think a server should
> make outgoing port 443 connections". After a lof of complains and
> arguments, and a dozen of shutdowns, I restricted my node to NON-EXIT.
> And filter my 443 outgoing at FW level, because even connecting to port
> 443 of other TOR nodes were considered "you have a compromised machine".

Do you have a specific reason to stay with OVH or why did you choose
this ISP? Is it particularly cheap or which positive arguments are there
to stay with this ISP?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF4EAREKAAYFAk3o9IIACgkQyM26BSNOM7a1/AD/c/KfZhzwkOU5W99QtfUQuFpG
pUy2y5gNy/QHm9SNl3gA/j8NYt0ircwlaenpg2YfRzO0wlePnjH4rO0zgJV28xdy
=sCf4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] Exit policy question
  - From: Jesus Cea
- Re: [tor-relays] Exit policy question
  - From: Moritz Bartl

References:
- [tor-relays] Exit policy question
  - From: George Gemelos
- Re: [tor-relays] Exit policy question
  - From: Justin Aplin
- Re: [tor-relays] Exit policy question
  - From: Jesus Cea

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] firewalled relays
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] firewalled relays
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] firewalled relays
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Exit policy question
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread