[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] firewalled relays (was: Exit policy question)

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] firewalled relays (was: Exit policy question)
From: tagnaq <tagnaq@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:44:58 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 09:45:05 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3xgvIViLHWViysA3Cxy2qC+hJrOgR9FJxxvp+/uHSys=; b=E9McCvvAAcUZraNpG5Dtt2m0J2iyEjbK18Jaqa6x4kKFF04/THIfVn61mREFG5KkxF TiJjVr/TqB405PeKcGkgrCx+eQYp7Gjz2kVdPA/0jxwYCW+wBYwIwHuim3Xl1MyEfJvb CTjsoNcCTWSmyq+c+gTTafuFFkYnZ6y/SPTjI=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dnh3fVSWHVTFf4aTWo5FqPwvWpgg76iLo7HavsDiyYhZGwJFKCS2C7sKV2qVeJifzg F1CBMniA9zE8Wi04qri+FmtBCyvRF3hzrNSqCvAbI+xLta9K3JM8UGgsD8Mv3F2AkUGm iPshSu0ZJMGqo1HZej5b7Q58ZrTYi+lnKRvj8=
In-reply-to: <4DE8E1E3.30709@xxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "This mailing list is for support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)." <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <B243443DF316414B99208874D2E409240362EF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2462C2A3-B186-4ABD-85D4-49C3772C9705@xxxxxxxxx> <4DE8D769.80408@xxxxxxx> <4DE8DDEB.6050404@xxxxxxxxx> <4DE8E1E3.30709@xxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 06/03/2011 03:30 PM, Jesus Cea wrote:
> I guess TOR should listen to several different ports. 

Yes, design work related to IPv6 support will bring multiple ORPort
support if I recall correct, but this wont prevent circuits to fail in
firewalled scenarios because your Tor process doesn't know that outbound
traffic going to port 443 is filtered and a client using your node
doesn't know that you are not able to connect to relays running on
ORPort 443.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF4EAREKAAYFAk3o5VoACgkQyM26BSNOM7aA1QEAouYdkqdT4Odi3XjpW0N2uDUz
bMd2THMDCcMk4v+9kJwA/jVV+/jsvNKesYhKKH1tEwei8cUSOX3Wb3lTul4wJu0N
=qFI1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] firewalled relays
  - From: Jesus Cea

References:
- [tor-relays] Exit policy question
  - From: George Gemelos
- Re: [tor-relays] Exit policy question
  - From: Justin Aplin
- Re: [tor-relays] Exit policy question
  - From: Jesus Cea
- Re: [tor-relays] Exit policy question
  - From: tagnaq
- Re: [tor-relays] Exit policy question
  - From: Jesus Cea

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Exit policy question
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] firewalled relays
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Exit policy question
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] firewalled relays
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread