Re: [tor-relays] bitcoin adopt a node idea

[Jurre van Bergen <jurre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hoi,

At hartvoorinternetvrijheid.nl we have been toying with the exact same
idea and I think Moritz had the same idea too. Cheap crowd sponsored
relays are interesting for several reasons, you feel part of the process
as a donator. Next to the fact that, at least we came up with that, that
you get statistics of how many people you have helped on to the Tor
network, with maybe a few links to relevant censorship news around the
world. The donor feels warm from the inside and we get to grow the Tor
network.

There is work to be done on this, but there is also already work done on
this, I guess we just need someone to coordinate all of this.

All the best,
Jurre

On 06/26/2014 03:09 PM, jason@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 	Sorry perhaps I didn't explain well enough. What I was pointing to was
> that tor could benefit from the idea of cheaply crowd sponsored relays
> that use ansible, chef or  puppet to spin up for a month. That the
> article is about bitcoin is merely coincidental.
> -J
> On 06/26/2014 05:35 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:
>> jason@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>>> This seems pretty damn similiar to something we should be offering for
>>> Tor relays, possibly even exits and bridges (if they only run for a
>>> month at a time). Possibly co-ordinated through the EFF?
>>>
>>> http://www.coindesk.com/adopt-node-project-aims-bolster-bitcoin-network-security/
>>>
>>      Assuming that the relevant bitcoin programs could be taught to talk
>> SOCKS, then it seems that tor hidden services would, in principle if not
>> in performance, be an ideal solution.  Running those bitcoin "full" nodes
>> as hidden services might well make them less vulnerable to being shut
>> down by currency counterfeiters (e.g., the Federal Reserve and the central
>> banks of other states, U.S. Dept. of the Treasury).  Performance of hidden
>> services, however, are severely constrained by the hidden services protocol,
>> which can slow connection times enough to make one consider USnail as a
>> possible alternative, and the need for circuits of 2n-1 relays, which makes
>> access even slower than normal tor circuits of n relays.
>>
>>
>>                                   Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
>> **********************************************************************
>> * Internet:   bennett at sdf.org   *or*   bennett at freeshell.org   *
>> *--------------------------------------------------------------------*
>> * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good  *
>> * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments *
>> * -- a standing army."                                               *
>> *    -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790         *
>> **********************************************************************
>>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays