Re: [tor-relays] Fwd: 2017-06-07 15:37: 65 new tor exits in 30 minutes

[grarpamp <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Arisbe <arisbe@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Content-Type: text/html :(

> Seems like none of us have the time to research these events or those before.  If people can't play by written and unwritten rules regarding Tor contact info, family members, etc. and they 'could' be a danger to anonymity, why does Tor bother with them?  If people are sincere about helping the Tor network, they will express that in their offers--otherwise, as in this situation, they should be removed until sufficient information is provided.

Both anonymity and nymity provide strengths and weakness to networks.
Certainly everyone can imagine some.

In that understanding, finding / creating "good" relays is as useful as
hunting for "bad" relays.

As before, if some set of rules and metrics might be felt important
to you or others in choosing relays to use, why not start a project to collate
and publish lists of relays based on that, then users can subscribe it.

Thanks to the appreciated efforts of those volunteering their time and
research to find things, these relays are up for a fat k-line real soon now :)
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays