[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] IPv6 to IPv4 tor exit relays would fix many daily tor-problems

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] IPv6 to IPv4 tor exit relays would fix many daily tor-problems
From: grarpamp <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 02:35:00 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 02:36:01 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WliMPpy/JB27r0y2G1SqUxoO5QoGQ9f/e0HsiZYPsB0=; b=hdRPOyNi0ySSycidlXtWcNAQ1t2d1Mw+xwu9yEOPZF/ZGcE4IDYzXoqkNagoUBGpre ZDDGoWiBp7ELsAz7t5ef3kp+TF/bgdGnu4c0zzKow5jFRRJEodVcnKgDCll+hxXZpZzg FWT0XMKSiXmTmWKqA1gAY0dcqHl+4QnMmYfy7bdLTAdqNgiYA99g4LY46PMK6sAUrS7z L3cyyripICXN9s9ytpEanXb10s2dIqJpzMT3Bl9eC05tXfgO5IjBAuZwbYQDpP6hpbsN BIX3njvHmUlQSc0b2o25CKrPlG/Zzjde4fJ3gIWrrLJ2aMZsXsP4pldopApBxFFBBg5H /ZUw==
In-reply-to: <BBBEA21E-4B69-4D2C-8B90-38A682966E30@gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <cDJgryupYfDXM4FLAVyro-KGcESqsQqn5agK27y-4F2_ibuRvoG7uY4ao3cKOqKZO3Z1cxcx_LX0MfYFEHXiuDdxaoW3flIFhiKHN2k-kOI=@protonmail.com> <BBBEA21E-4B69-4D2C-8B90-38A682966E30@gmail.com>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> We don't know how to give users good anonymity when some relays can't
> connect to other relays. This would happen if we allowed IPv4-only relays
> and IPv6-only relays in the same network.

With "IPv6 only" relays available in the consensus the answer may be...
when their count is the same as when IPv4 relays were at the same count,
what was being stated and roughly understood about tor's anonymity back then?
And is it much different from today. And given respective traffic loadings, etc.
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] IPv6 to IPv4 tor exit relays would fix many daily tor-problems
  - From: Scott Bennett

References:
- [tor-relays] IPv6 to IPv4 tor exit relays would fix many daily tor-problems
  - From: Fof582
- Re: [tor-relays] IPv6 to IPv4 tor exit relays would fix many daily tor-problems
  - From: teor

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] torservers.net: some exits became guards? (deanonymization risk)
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Fwd: 2017-06-07 15:37: 65 new tor exits in 30 minutes
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] IPv6 to IPv4 tor exit relays would fix many daily tor-problems
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] IPv6 to IPv4 tor exit relays would fix many daily tor-problems
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread