[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] torservers.net: some exits became guards? (deanonymization risk)

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] torservers.net: some exits became guards? (deanonymization risk)
From: Gareth Llewellyn <gareth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 23:38:32 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 18:38:49 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networksaremadeofstring-co-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=dacK4iVQn6cdrYbkuaeI8cA1abSvAoAbDlDJGBhVSDM=; b=IORNe+9PAdCoNZGIPg2HTBuMYuBxepX+sD5bmsHe8RArZv908Y1NUbufVtayinHrjt LJ3/+kwzMzQbK9U57ZZiPwvOdg78J8Zw23EEKSXkTGLTBUo17NzYbW272Isn7Mq2ODoh +6Y4Ldwn1QVKCt2d2sZw8hYG34C0KUuDq7jLunj1h6R2IPULeNJrDAOgnyrZlIIzvG5s u/xv6Bwe7C8lPy8vxvMH+Xt/maNbJQS0oFlUTmytJWJDhny3RCMalQ41mMz16o43rhXB 0H/BAWhFCTO/rhyKxZZG0onfS6JZTypdIfx9MZQqGwV2onYioTuDsGZ1lE9QuIpRvUP5 30Xg==
In-reply-to: <b95265fe-3ab2-8d71-ce3e-8fa85c8a93cb@torservers.net>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <341f5a8a-107f-083f-6576-aa561e44b4d9@riseup.net> <20170608120050.GB32734@vpn212046.nrl.navy.mil> <b95265fe-3ab2-8d71-ce3e-8fa85c8a93cb@torservers.net>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Moritz Bartl <moritz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

We had to temporarily disable some of our exits due to ongoing
negotiations with the provider.

Will your provider allow BGP announcements of other IP space?

Depending on how many exits we're talking about I (BrassHornCommunications / AS28715) will happily 'loan' you a /24 and a /48-/36 to route from which will remove the abuse complaints from your provider.

(FWIW I'd rather not give up a /24 if you're happy using your providers v4 for general Tor routing and AS28715's IPv6 for exiting that'd be ideal).

Alternatively I can sponsor your RIPE v6 PI application (subject to the new rules about having a 'contractual relationship yadda yadda) if you'd like to do that.

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] torservers.net: some exits became guards? (deanonymization risk)
  - From: Moritz Bartl

References:
- [tor-relays] torservers.net: some exits became guards? (deanonymization risk)
  - From: nusenu
- Re: [tor-relays] torservers.net: some exits became guards? (deanonymization risk)
  - From: Paul Syverson
- Re: [tor-relays] torservers.net: some exits became guards? (deanonymization risk)
  - From: Moritz Bartl

Prev by Author: [tor-relays] IPv6 to IPv4 tor exit relays would fix many daily tor-problems
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] IPv6 to IPv4 tor exit relays would fix many daily tor-problems
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] torservers.net: some exits became guards? (deanonymization risk)
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] torservers.net: some exits became guards? (deanonymization risk)
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread