[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] torservers.net: some exits became guards? (deanonymization risk)

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] torservers.net: some exits became guards? (deanonymization risk)
From: Moritz Bartl <moritz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 14:44:31 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 08:44:50 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=headstrong.de; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :in-reply-to:mime-version:date:date:message-id:from:from :references:subject:subject:received; s=mail; t=1497185072; x= 1498999473; bh=pZArqP85kVFECJbYZLJzaWERByGsQO4oPvJDtFp4sLc=; b=I ZQWQI9jV7DF15SIqGdBec+fg5tEZMCGniDpo+OLY8KmDWPqJdcTp63MsFPfcbDE7 B/xgOsvI5OtCD4AZgQDSy0sm0kXNKijSJVMKD9oiHnRl8YXKfxitzzpHbGnHKAL+ bzuYs617kzaKKra5cKS+IfpUdxGwU/e7h5AbUgsxV0=
In-reply-to: <CAM8M=kgv7h-PsDT2njJdH7bZiJ3RYizXbiimMLNpRVdf1_YsGg@mail.gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <341f5a8a-107f-083f-6576-aa561e44b4d9@riseup.net> <20170608120050.GB32734@vpn212046.nrl.navy.mil> <b95265fe-3ab2-8d71-ce3e-8fa85c8a93cb@torservers.net> <CAM8M=kgv7h-PsDT2njJdH7bZiJ3RYizXbiimMLNpRVdf1_YsGg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 11.06.2017 00:38, Gareth Llewellyn wrote:
> Will your provider allow BGP announcements of other IP space?

Yes. In fact, we're discussing abuse issues with our current source of
IP space, not the datacenter, where we in theory could get 10GE of free
bandwidth.

> Depending on how many exits we're talking about I
> (BrassHornCommunications / AS28715) will happily 'loan' you a /24

This is a great offer, much appreciated! I don't want to lose our
current IP space, though, so I will try to reach an agreement with the
current provider first. If this does not move within the next few weeks,
I definitely will take you up on that offer.

We have our own AS and v6 space already (AS60729).

-- 
Moritz Bartl
https://www.torservers.net/
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

References:
- [tor-relays] torservers.net: some exits became guards? (deanonymization risk)
  - From: nusenu
- Re: [tor-relays] torservers.net: some exits became guards? (deanonymization risk)
  - From: Paul Syverson
- Re: [tor-relays] torservers.net: some exits became guards? (deanonymization risk)
  - From: Moritz Bartl
- Re: [tor-relays] torservers.net: some exits became guards? (deanonymization risk)
  - From: Gareth Llewellyn

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] torservers.net: some exits became guards? (deanonymization risk)
Next by Author: [tor-relays] IP space for Tor exits - any takers?
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] torservers.net: some exits became guards? (deanonymization risk)
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] torservers.net: some exits became guards? (deanonymization risk)
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread