Re: [tor-relays] weighting algorithm

Subject: Re: [tor-relays] weighting algorithm

Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 16:57:58 -0500

Delivery-date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 16:58:51 -0500

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=mvwU+TQtjRRzd3QEtjorPDWZmhiQYD222TRpspOADrs=; b=Xm46AMOEcl32HHtZbvicSSBmf3Dmz23xt3WCq+Zui1V4Pml/6GYYtrpjiLhdIIR4xS QGV3b0IncSfJ+puQhyo7R0PqtVF/dVgoDPl/7t3X3YCl2y0hSiUWfL3T9PBCrDzJs7/T p5Be7dWMe0L63RSyHeEENHtJvPJMr+WWVTrmI=

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=TyAndgYG4xWE/dg6wrrNGg9ah7GxAC3QaopPuKPEcXzGdPnV3XceJPPWsVKQDaCNBK bn2Dfok3ioBaccroIMRqimlRCAcnQ7LaGdpMEk2DSTn4dT574Odd5gZZeY/wK27DB4pK uHdP0t+rMjUF6U8kl4gftJCB+Kod5Km0HsWPw=

In-reply-to: <20110302123723.GA32111@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays>

List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>

List-id: "This mailing list is for support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)." <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>

List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>

List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>

List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>

References: <4D6E2899.4060105@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110302123723.GA32111@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Sender: tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

We lost 2 of our 4 bandwidth scanners between Saturday at 18:00 UTC and
Tuesday at 14:00 UTC. We need at least 3 scanner results for clients to
use the measured bandwidth values instead of the self-reported ones.

Have you considered adding more bandwidth scanners? Is the quorum of 3/4 designed to prevent a pair of scanners from being evil, or to ensure that representative sample is used?

_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays