[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: (FWD) Sync system time with Tor network?
- To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: (FWD) Sync system time with Tor network?
- From: grarpamp <grarpamp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 01:16:32 -0400
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: tor-relays-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Fri, 14 May 2010 01:16:45 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MtJhWVtgWI+KbyzN8c4KY/x46JmJjm75//C1OptUY1A=; b=FZXD7nqK958FrIH4s+8z4XcjkVtp1M9A5bntjxT+ylIsVm4F1bic+e2xFgjOr2jY1m Q6jWZYf+CHaUClI9JbtkWFwDoOvodu8S/V3Vc3Mlw+uymEViQPlTWp5A6aV8V1rEAzca dR2zOMatnHFA0LxsvM2Emxj4QgC8HJvVy/wbw=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=PP8JQz/1PlcrH5YSmiD/sTh4Icg27ku32jy4kixL9PmyGfFU3SCJnPhHxfhk1qOqFD S1B9tjeDkQ8vQMBRFoBe7L0M/dg9qF3UHfE0MRsPDQ8wd7sNtfB5bIYFHVTTO1L8RzG2 qlXEOjoq+4m6KBKCH1qU8wTHr43Zg3UVO1QlU=
- In-reply-to: <20100514034815.GI4392@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <20100514034815.GI4392@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
If tor is bitching with an offset, as you said it is, script that into date(1).
I know of no real reason not to run ntpdate/ntpd in a sandbox. Nor do I
frequently encounter a system that doesn't have at least something other
than Tor bound to the network stack.
> (the log is filled with messages telling how far off the clock is off with
> the concensus).