Re: [tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth

[Spencer Neitzke <spencer@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi zwiebel,

I have informed Linode of this and they are perfectly fine with it. As for the uptime, I just started this a few days ago and have been tweaking the rules every now and then to achieve the best results. If I understand it correctly the Stable tag should be added to my relay after 7 days of continuous service.

Thanks,
Spencer

On May 19, 2014, 4:22, zwiebel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Next hi

I find your IP could be on http://www.linode.com. If right I see in https://www.linode.com/pricing there is a monthly(?!) transfer limit of 3TB to 16TB on first glance. Be careful not to run into volume (and extra cost) trouble. Reduce bandwidth to a even lower value until you know things better. A 100Mbit/s relay can transfer (in plus out) more than 1TB per day easily.

Â

If I investigated something wrong I apologize.

Â

Linode is ok with your Tor Exit?

Â

Felix

Â

Gesendet:ÂMontag, 19. Mai 2014 um 10:59 Uhr
Von:Âzwiebel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
An:Âtor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff:ÂRe: [tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth

Hi

It seems something is wrong with your relay. Look at https://consensus-health.torproject.org/ and search your Nickname. You will see it is not voted to be stable.

Further if you check for https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/21F84E3EC92BA954307C28A8B302F52F55E5A54D you will see drop-out times, which might be the reason for not stable.

Â

You have an idea why your relay goes down all 1-2 days? Reboots? See Linux 'uptime' command. You can check Tor notices.log and my be Linux logs.

May-be set the bandwidth to a lower (5MB/s) value until all runs stable. Lift it later.

Â

Felix

Â

Gesendet:ÂMontag, 19. Mai 2014 um 07:26 Uhr
Von:Â"Spencer Neitzke" <spencer@xxxxxxxxxx>
An:Âtor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff:Â[tor-relays] Advertised Bandwidth

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hello,
My advertised bandwidth is much slower than what it should actually be. I am running on a network that easily achieves 2gbps, although atlas is reporting 4.15mb/s. Have I misconfigured something?

Nickname - ServerX5690


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: OpenPGP.js v0.5.1
Comment: http://openpgpjs.org

wsBcBAEBCAAQBQJTeZXmCRAgZfyIs5JzlAAABhkH/0GeOwtqo1sE5aT7jQVT
taaOKZmJiIgDfBA0KQZdq8WLAkT2V61wiOHcWf6PXIouvY/Tt3n+aWs85v4n
cs5Rahj83MYZArKIm9wQ34hEkYu6Fku9HVIVZBWpPcFC6aZgKDk9xgKo4qO1
+OjxsoE8liY0WYVr9BabWKsN3+kiwWDQUk/Et48xPk6YyFJLj0Bjqa951SQf
J7lTjitrfxYqPn6GHiz9njhO/szHOP24aLJR5jIagBbGJzlxeQ686C4ptDVM
DuZjeTqmN6ZmVWZv5M44FdJknfUigRnUerWVBjfrVuHGU5pnSVf6owSduOX4
U+kK3PlbOrk+0zfQiyJBeuU=
=A0nS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Â

Â

_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays