[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[tor-relays] BWauth kookiness
Some possible fallout related to
the earlier discussion
[tor-relays] amount of unmeasured relays continuously rising since 2 weeks
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2015-May/007003.html
My relay
Binnacle 4F0DB7E687FC7C0AE55C8F243DA8B0EB27FBF1F2
has 9375 Kbyte (75 Mbit) of unfuzzy
(no ISP traffic shaping) bandwidth,
but in the last few days the BWAuths'
opinion went from
# gabelmoo
# tor26
# moria1
# longclaw
bw1-w Bandwidth=7382 Measured=7100
*bw2-w Bandwidth=7382 Measured=9330
bw3-w Bandwidth=7382 Measured=13700 GuardFraction=69
bw4-w Bandwidth=7382 Measured=23700
to
bw1-w Bandwidth=9375 Measured=17100
bw3-w Bandwidth=9375 Measured=77900 GuardFraction=75
*bw4-w Bandwidth=9375 Measured=23000
* selected for consensus
While it's flattering to be promoted
to double the actual capacity, with the
potential to go 8x, I suspect it's
may not a great idea in the grand
scheme of things.
And to think at one time I was feeling
short-changed. . .
FYI BWauths
Regards
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays