[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] BWauth kookiness

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] BWauth kookiness
From: starlight.2015q2@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 18:46:10 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 20 May 2015 18:47:50 -0400
In-reply-to: <6.2.5.6.2.20150520180714.0722b748@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20150520180714.0722b748@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Should probably add that this
relay was tuned and would be
expected to show somewhat better
performance than a typical relay
of the same capacity, but
I wouldn't expect more than
a 20-30% boost from that.

The local bandwidth observation
was, at the time of the consensus
sample

published 2015-05-20 07:33:13
bandwidth 9375000 9375000 9713664

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

References:
- [tor-relays] BWauth kookiness
  - From: starlight . 2015q2

Prev by Author: [tor-relays] BWauth kookiness
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Drop in relay count
Previous by thread: [tor-relays] BWauth kookiness
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] BWauth kookiness
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread