Re: [tor-relays] Strange behaviour Tor 0.2.9.10 - off topic

[Ian Zimmerman <itz@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2017-05-18 20:56, Felix wrote:

> Indeed it's not broken, it's *Usenet Signature Convention*
> https://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3676.txt (chapter 4.3.)
> 
> That's old school - how we saved bandwidth in ancient times :)

Not only that, it helps when you _want_ part of your article to be
invisible until explicit reader action.  Examples include story
"spoilers" (books, movies, plays, sports games), puzzles, learning
exercises etc.

-- 
Please *no* private Cc: on mailing lists and newsgroups
Personal signed mail: please _encrypt_ and sign
Don't clear-text sign:
http://primate.net/~itz/blog/the-problem-with-gpg-signatures.html
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays