On 24/05/2017 03:25, teor wrote: >> On 24 May 2017, at 01:05, Cristian Consonni <cristian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I am a little bit perplexed because I responded to a call for fallback >> dirs last December (Dec 2016), but then I got no answer or confirmation >> that the relay was elected to become a fallback dir and so I assumed it >> was not. > > Sorry about that, I tried to BCC all the fallback operators the first > few times we changed the list. > > But it is a lot of work, and sometimes spam filters eat the email > anyway. > > So this time I just announced it on tor-relays: > https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/2017-May/012285.html No worries :-) >> Now, from this list[1] I see that it has the FallbackDir flag. >> >> So, again, in this case I should try to keep the same IP address when >> upgrading, right? > > Please keep the same IP address, ports, and RSA and ed25519 keys > (fingerprint). I'll do. Cristian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays