[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
From: Travis Northrup <northruptc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 18:49:42 -0600
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 19:50:02 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dBCSwngOzLGLEqIjcIDntiAbtXb3/DntWHnVJ9F3y0U=; b=fxI/e4JZs+sqvJnMJUsaGdndmJiCSqY9/m56dRowPlUYetU+tLS18QnFvl1YZ//g4U YdkEI9cpUA/5KnsqUlYjrgFSHTecG+Ts1Sz9IbCUxir+TnCKFt4YNY3VQh00yt227IZj y1GAg8EZ71HW8b8cOwxWQee6zE2+LmSQ1tDpyqNjrjjDRZXLEMLnBk3a6BWZtHYZhc2X 8RRzgJNQJIiRth2wt2YmTNe881SXCEypaycDB5GHmJ6mFbqDaA8e8/SZ4K+Cja81M3Dk YOAgNPn002rTmdgWetVcd2x0SuEN4H2Fga+O3S7cjEx9iic8RdMFXND63586aNFGWhNi /Ykg==
In-reply-to: <20131125215141.63b10335@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CAD2Ti2-EeNYqCGysetkGo+ehrUhZqsCA=PJ10zUhs_tLZ5d=1Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131118080425.GB2311@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAD2Ti29hJVjfX_xzajY4hF25cux4_gXWZOMSoYB5Retudnf5Hw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131118192945.GI2311@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAD2Ti2-ABBS_Az5NMBt7CQDOQ4sLYzy4-wgE2zPNWZmWNBf0wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <528B7FDD.8040908@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <528F914A.6090307@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131123120141.GB26567@loar> <52912C30.7010603@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131125040635.GS31806@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <52939720.5010906@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAD2Ti29Yrko6GjA36Ve9DDHj7oX=0ThxoV=-9eEmBwEDehonyg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131125215141.63b10335@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> 

> This argument (Mbit/s versus GiB/month) reminds me of the old saw
> about the most useless unit of velocity (furlongs/fortnight instead
> of m/sec).
> 
> Mick

I know exactly what you mean. Personally, I consider any change to be
a convenience modification only. In reality the only current
differences are in defining storage rate and traffic rate (1024/1000
respectively) and its defined in bits. From there all conversions are
simple math that should be operator responsibility.

Regards,
Travis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSk/AmAAoJECJSqAwXZ/cnZBcH/2RbiydXZwTk5vwhOSfdG9wB
nqvExUaqTUIsrfgc406TxoU01gZNTCc5Qo6aKeNCHthM/z8yQDW8mSG6Cxu1LuPL
vULJ8U44quVy0i0K9hYoD5C6H1oHl7HqiqH0iAffAiCIEbPAVyycDm2+vHLFv0o2
a9MWd4a68ACA5Z5kRXlpfpxp0OUitgx9XvaT3C+bKWex5xSnHJabl/C9MFSSJXEj
6zKWEMh9QtK/BbYBMEb2Je/JzNtURFcqhWxGIqS326zBkrWEJ/dydcjOU5Chk/lD
9jPUHMwO7WvwtYA8vqPraCMX+aHXLkPvvfDmc8Ng66p08swznj8YKNfC5G+OB7I=
=ay2f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
  - From: Gordon Morehouse

References:
- [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
  - From: grarpamp
- Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
  - From: Andreas Krey
- Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
  - From: grarpamp
- Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
  - From: Andreas Krey
- Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
  - From: grarpamp
- Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
  - From: krishna e bera
- Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
  - From: Gordon Morehouse
- Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
  - From: Lunar
- Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
  - From: Gordon Morehouse
- Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
  - From: Roger Dingledine
- Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
  - From: Gordon Morehouse
- Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
  - From: grarpamp
- Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
  - From: mick

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Amazon abuse report
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Minimum Requirements for a fast exit relay
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread