[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
From: Travis Northrup <northruptc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 17:41:51 -0600
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 18:42:05 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/rtQLHnEhmI5xMz2sz3BoOBOpnJ9VtduqetgEY0wwFA=; b=JNtbBcUsz7P2bE3iHTC85M3mkX3TytpxcZgopPA11u1kiHCUcR8yqMWr3kKJDeCkqO fDIvxftotRcHRMXP7qx/tZbxLrGWHRKgvgp5SJ/fLDQcZNI07sUGDgiwGi4t0LpsNEIh jd80LmO7KXb9DAZriGzPoqSSh9JrU+fMjmH57CsosSKYkDOZvKOQYI6rFomKy6NDMAf0 LjpR1yFKRNXY48hOW7/27/fi2gs20DZ6Ruskdwp6me+buwcJGIAPKEfH0C0t3VglUoMq IpdP7UZIg9X3cRJvkRHKVomaTAMR+SR9/g4Rt6EHagVVCUdRHp9TZOVrlxU2qHLJuUWw UUPA==
In-reply-to: <52951855.7010803@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CAD2Ti2-EeNYqCGysetkGo+ehrUhZqsCA=PJ10zUhs_tLZ5d=1Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131118080425.GB2311@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAD2Ti29hJVjfX_xzajY4hF25cux4_gXWZOMSoYB5Retudnf5Hw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131118192945.GI2311@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAD2Ti2-ABBS_Az5NMBt7CQDOQ4sLYzy4-wgE2zPNWZmWNBf0wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <528B7FDD.8040908@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <528F914A.6090307@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131123120141.GB26567@loar> <52912C30.7010603@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131125040635.GS31806@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <52939720.5010906@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAD2Ti29Yrko6GjA36Ve9DDHj7oX=0ThxoV=-9eEmBwEDehonyg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20131125215141.63b10335@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5293F026.9040005@xxxxxxxxx> <52951855.7010803@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Yes, it can. The program can spend the processor time to run that extra
instruction set. Do we actually need or want that? Would it be worth
spending the cpu time in exchange for just a miniscule effort to do it
ourselves?

On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 3:53:25 PM, Gordon Morehouse wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Travis Northrup:
>>
>>
>>> This argument (Mbit/s versus GiB/month) reminds me of the old
>>> saw about the most useless unit of velocity (furlongs/fortnight
>>> instead of m/sec).
>>
>>> Mick
>>
>> I know exactly what you mean. Personally, I consider any change to
>> be a convenience modification only. In reality the only current
>> differences are in defining storage rate and traffic rate
>> (1024/1000 respectively) and its defined in bits. From there all
>> conversions are simple math that should be operator
>> responsibility.
>
> Why, when the config file can be liberal in what it accepts in the
> numerator, and in the denominator (seconds, days, weeks, mean months)?
>
> Calculating numbers is a job for a computer.
>
> Best,
> - -Gordon M.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJSlRhVAAoJED/jpRoe7/ujzC0IANGMKvdbnvOO9lebNa81ETo9
> 6st2Dyt8Cy3qVmWevVT3JP6GZIpLVAk4M5SeFUm3abY2kbphIJfnnKVGYR/B3ggI
> 5uVTUN5uFIZmePAoMxHh53Y9ss5IYizvFFli3jaeg7iJnYjQl6zeogBCp275YCR0
> tbNeZ4BisXzXUDavTm5c23x0d9fo7z7b7i+SMhPs3DanZG3JLPHtTX+aYiBRjRlY
> hZJE9K6i+cvYEEId24tqo/uymEw8BFeCj5Ws32Gj9fHXSn64JDUaEawmmTXXsfvA
> DTUGLbRAVfdRDWrQl9JXTZLswMkis5SrrTeoehwo93cjgvl5z7uBa6/rK9WxwzY=
> =MdoA
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSlTG/AAoJECJSqAwXZ/cnKcIIALVECDceF/aKsJV+D7nxVaJ8
H6tjAwj3nKqY1/LR8uPg7Z3E4mfuIRi6df/WUMxH1NP0sbFpWz1NY30iOEt9lAb1
fLY+exqmCYBifoNB7e5Gcss2QcqGhoCl6T9HYVoT9QmFZrlZvjr0goBCPQEdYwqC
p2wW0zZftzCFKl3jCTtAiYslDvCLbujyYtlVWFqjlQjAuWNMJ0z/7Ntx4kquSzCc
vKioMv95oQVT2MZywh5amNYNr/qYiKWYbAzL8FwZm9PMG2MQjZGiLxRpmwzmUrp6
HwSGjATO4dOSrRfPWsAW/XwJuioJbILdJUIrs9bXYubN9cX8BSp4PgtMziFDfAw=
=BeA7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

References:
- [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
  - From: grarpamp
- Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
  - From: Andreas Krey
- Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
  - From: grarpamp
- Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
  - From: Andreas Krey
- Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
  - From: grarpamp
- Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
  - From: krishna e bera
- Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
  - From: Gordon Morehouse
- Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
  - From: Lunar
- Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
  - From: Gordon Morehouse
- Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
  - From: Roger Dingledine
- Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
  - From: Gordon Morehouse
- Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
  - From: grarpamp
- Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
  - From: mick
- Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
  - From: Travis Northrup
- Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
  - From: Gordon Morehouse

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread