[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-relays] GoodBadISPs revamp?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
had to create a new thread because i had digests turned on. oh well.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014, Thomas White wrote:
> As a community I think we should also be more transparent in
> communications with the ISP's in question. For example, rather than
> stating a yes/no instead we find a tidy way to paste their exact
> response and link it in the table so we know exactly who they talked
> to, waht their question was and the reason they disallowed it.
i agree with this. in addition, we should ask for all of the ASN and/or IP
blocks from the customer service reps, query onionoo for nodes running
within those and display a list of them. (how?)
in regards to the EFF partnership idea: i support this. getting the name
of a respectable entity who has experience in PR (what kind?) might help
with getting the ISPs on board.
- --
mikael ball
0xB1910271AE8587F4
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=Xniq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays