[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] GoodBadISPs revamp?

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] GoodBadISPs revamp?
From: "mikael ball" <subkeys@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 19:19:25 -0700
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 22:19:37 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1413339565; bh=EfI6WHn31LU+/S4H8BWOMCPBzcWB32DQ/bhK8Cl+p3E=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Date:Subject:From:To:From; b=IhYPDEDpqH2kCiT/O7MszxhfDw309PnrChkAhEGi3EF75To2rdIwHj+dNAwH1pHKm cuUPK+1M88yvmgSiB4u5GRhOh5268BX2CEZUm403a5HXf2buc45QZgmj0gDl/Z+IwA lrKl0djrMMwC6sEGAAUktkb/hoORTD+399mTd3LM=
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <543DCF74.1060308@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <9c75bcd857735052022e6c6594245178.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <543D5F94.5020209@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <543DCF74.1060308@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.23 [SVN]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

> One shortcoming somebody highlighted to me on IRC today was Tor doesn't
> not have a page for ISPs and nearly all work communicating to ISP's is
> left to the individual.

Moritz did/does have a page with ISP inqury templates, but they are
outdated and specifically aligned to certain hosting offers from the ISPs
rather than a general inquiry regaring tor (exit) hosting on a perspective
ISP's network.

also, in the templates, we should have a excerpt asking for the ASN the
host operates from to help correct the lack of ASN diversity... just
thoughts.

cheers


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=mBp+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

References:
- [tor-relays] GoodBadISPs revamp?
  - From: subkeys
- Re: [tor-relays] GoodBadISPs revamp?
  - From: tor-exit0
- Re: [tor-relays] GoodBadISPs revamp?
  - From: Thomas White

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] GoodBadISPs revamp?
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] About bug #13256: "torsocks 1.3 possibly leaks username"
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] GoodBadISPs revamp?
Next by thread: Re: [tor-relays] GoodBadISPs revamp?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread