[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-relays] exit node experience: abuse over HTTP, stealrat infection
Hi Fabian,
Quoting Fabian Keil (2014-10-21 12:55:21)
> Manuel Gebauer <manuel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Although, the greater risk in my opinion, comes from the question
> > if tor operators can be seen as service providers who would be
> > exempt from responsibility for transmitted information under the
> > term of this law. There's no precedence to my knowledge, but
> > private wireless APs are in fact not exempt from responsibility.
>
> Citation needed.
"FÃr ein schlecht gesichertes WLAN besteht StÃrerhaftung." BGH,
Urteil v. 12.05.2010, Az. I ZR 121/08, Link:
http://tlmd.in/u/1057
I cant't of course cite missing precedence concerning tor,
because it is missing.
> As far as precedence is concerned, I believe that all the Tor-related
> raids in Germany (that I became aware of) ended with the state attorney
> closing the investigation (against the Tor operator) after finally
> realising that the offending traffic came through Tor.
Citation needed. :)
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays