++ 21/10/14 22:29 +0200 - Manuel Gebauer: >> > Although, the greater risk in my opinion, comes from the question >> > if tor operators can be seen as service providers who would be >> > exempt from responsibility for transmitted information under the >> > term of this law. There's no precedence to my knowledge, but >> > private wireless APs are in fact not exempt from responsibility. >> >> Citation needed. > >"Für ein schlecht gesichertes WLAN besteht Störerhaftung." BGH, >Urteil v. 12.05.2010, Az. I ZR 121/08, Link: A "schlecht gesichertes WLAN" is, of course, something else than a deliberately opened router. The intentions of the owner a different, for a starter. Anyway, I am not sure whether this is worth a discussion or debate on this list. -- Rejo Zenger E rejo@xxxxxxxxx | P +31(0)639642738 | W https://rejo.zenger.nl T @rejozenger | J rejo@xxxxxxxxx OpenPGP 1FBF 7B37 6537 68B1 2532 A4CB 0994 0946 21DB EFD4 XMPP OTR 271A 9186 AFBC 8124 18CF 4BE2 E000 E708 F811 5ACF
Attachment:
pgpRxdizmPGhX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays