[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-relays] sum of consensus weight of 2 relays running at the same IP

To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] sum of consensus weight of 2 relays running at the same IP
From: teor <teor2345@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 23:45:13 +1100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 08:45:32 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date:subject:message-id :references:in-reply-to:to; bh=HsOoTYgT7ITgsGLaYWoquzkrW9U0pHdc8Ydp7MgHbGU=; b=ichSuVKfC1HOKwoGzLqOenPKh347G1NXPfqPpdOYO88QN0u28pKpx3a6lCQGZ8k2br PQDa90wfL2+upsebotJ+F+7DFFU2sidP93QLBSbJvWsrihpKqG8m2Y0iSjPqwtLUj0Lv k1D8nk5UhP/QC48N5hNuRDkAnNxCIOjCjoysUg6Rmh3jzFAlSxhH6Oxt89lw9dcF8zDX EtB1b56wAUychneQ+8N4GntPRH5V/NSqYUMXTz1/J9Gc7F8+cCq9rM7jjJXILUAvp9mK 1nIiFV+A1NM81Qgxlw0IZQmXnheJiWA4vwiBiVAsLPvRUXxxv4KmLn0utQ3X6NfmM/1I XSbg==
In-reply-to: <90e7845c-79a9-882e-8f9c-f48aa0e8df54@gmx.de>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-relays/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays \(exit, non-exit, bridge\)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-relays>, <mailto:tor-relays-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <f15e8bdf-c840-7bb8-4666-c056c8e95f7c@gmx.de> <EDBC2735-1FA8-4B16-91AE-1D644FAF290A@gmail.com> <90e7845c-79a9-882e-8f9c-f48aa0e8df54@gmx.de>
Reply-to: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-relays" <tor-relays-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 29 Oct 2017, at 23:30, Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@xxxxxx> wrote:

>> On 10/29/2017 01:24 PM, teor wrote:
>> Possibly.
>> 
>> Are the relays CPU-limited, or bandwidth-limited?
> 
> Not at all, neither limited by a config value nor by the hardware (1GBit/s, 200 MBit/s guaranteed, i7-3930, all non-Tor processes have "nice" in front, ids are 1AF72E8906E6C49481A791A6F8F84F8DFEBBB2BA and 6EABEBF38CE7E3DF672C4DB01383606FE3EB2215)

I'm sorry, this doesn't help me answer your question.

Usually, a relay is limited by either the available network bandwidth, or by the
speed of a single CPU core on the machine.

If the first relay used all the available bandwidth, then two relays will eventually
have lower consensus weight values.

If the first relay used all of a single CPU core for its main thread, then the two
relays will eventually have similar consensus weight values.

T
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

References:
- [tor-relays] sum of consensus weight of 2 relays running at the same IP
  - From: Toralf Förster
- Re: [tor-relays] sum of consensus weight of 2 relays running at the same IP
  - From: teor
- Re: [tor-relays] sum of consensus weight of 2 relays running at the same IP
  - From: Toralf Förster

Prev by Author: Re: [tor-relays] SSH Bruteforce Attempts
Next by Author: Re: [tor-relays] Testing Golang relay implementation
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-relays] sum of consensus weight of 2 relays running at the same IP
Next by thread: [tor-relays] Exit probability
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread