Re: [tor-relays] Individual Operator Exit Probability Threshold

[Scott Bennett <bennett@xxxxxxx>]

dawuud <dawuud@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> > I think it is worth remembering that there isn't evidence there is a
> > global passive adversary at the moment, even if certain agencies and
> > organizations clearly aspire to be one.
>
> Quite so. It is well established that these so called agencies do not
> aspire to be passive. Or perhaps you simply typed the word "passive" by
> shear force of habit and instead meant to convey "suffiently global adversary". :)

     Curiouser and curiouser!  So, dawuud, you imply that habit has a
velocity vector(!) and that it changes over distance(!!) in one or more
dimensions, and thus exerts a shear force on...what?  A typist's fingers
and hand placed within the volume where shear is present?  Strong enough,
perhaps, to roll them up and maybe even break a wrist?  Well, I guess one
lives and learns!  (Hint:  you misplaced a homonym.:)


                                  Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**********************************************************************
* Internet:   bennett at sdf.org   *xor*   bennett at freeshell.org  *
*--------------------------------------------------------------------*
* "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good  *
* objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments *
* -- a standing army."                                               *
*    -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790         *
**********************************************************************
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays