Re: [tor-relays] Individual Operator Exit Probability Threshold

[Duncan <dguthrie@xxxxxxxxxx>]

dawuud:
> 
>> I think it is worth remembering that there isn't evidence there is a
>> global passive adversary at the moment, even if certain agencies and
>> organizations clearly aspire to be one.
> 
> Quite so. It is well established that these so called agencies do not
> aspire to be passive. Or perhaps you simply typed the word "passive" by
> shear force of habit and instead meant to convey "suffiently global adversary". :)
> 

I was mostly commenting on the use of the word "passive", but I agree
with you that "sufficiently global adversary" is perhaps a better word.

Doesn't a lot of it depend on context anyway? How can we quantify
something like this?
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays