Re: [tor-talk] Hijacking Advertising to give a Tor Exit node economic sustainability?

["Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)" <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 8/7/11 3:11 PM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> Hi Fabio,
> 
> Before you (or someone else) start to even think about hijacking
> traffic, which is against mostly everything the Tor project stands for,
> apply or help us apply for grants. There is a large number of grants a
> Tor exit node operator, especially if it's an officially registered
> non-profit organization like ours, could apply for. We just don't do so
> at the moment for lack of time.

I agree, but the premise of that thread was that this approach could:
a) leverage ethical and legal issues
b) could be unfeasible

So i am not pointing out if "it's good to do it or not" but if it would
be "feasible or not" and in which proportion .

Let's make some hobbyist study on it and evaluate how 'an adv based tor
sustainability model' would work on a spreadsheet :-)

At least to know the hypothetical cost/return ratio:
With 100GB of tor traffic, how much GB of additional Tor traffic you
could buy?

-naif

p.s. see you at ccc camp, i am at Italian Embassy in front of French Embassy
_______________________________________________
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk