[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: choosing a syslog facility other than 'daemon'

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: choosing a syslog facility other than 'daemon'
From: Roger Dingledine <arma@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 03:42:23 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: or-talk@seul.org
Delivery-date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 03:42:25 -0500
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.61.0601232100530.22876@pants.snark.net>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.61.0601232100530.22876@pants.snark.net>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 09:02:05PM -0800, Matt Ghali wrote:
> Is there a user-friendly way to ask tor to log to a different 
> facility than 'daemon'? IE, something that does not involve editing 
> the source and recompiling :)

Hi Matt,

You're the only person who wants this, as far as I've heard. Did
you have another facility in mind, or did you want to handle all
of them?

I would be pleased to apply a patch. :)

--Roger

Follow-Ups:
- Re: choosing a syslog facility other than 'daemon'
  - From: Matt Ghali

References:
- choosing a syslog facility other than 'daemon'
  - From: Matt Ghali

Prev by Author: Re: Bandwidth shaping by time of day / week / month? Adding that info to Tor protocol?
Next by Author: Re: facility for specifying that a Tor node should not be preferred?
Previous by thread: choosing a syslog facility other than 'daemon'
Next by thread: Re: choosing a syslog facility other than 'daemon'
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread