>> I've been meaning to ask you: Is Amaya (currently 1.4a) better at >> compiling into HTML than Composer, etc? >> >> "http://www.w3.org/amaya" > >Amaya is dead AFAIK. It's too buggy. It's html output is also pretty >bad. Not dead, the latest release is Jan 12,1999. haven't used it myself though so I can't comment on quality. -matt