|
On 03/16/2016 04:53 AM, Azat Khuzhin
wrote:
It's better to enable locking for bufferevents anyway.Are you sure it is ok to lock the bufferevents by our own lock? No need to implement these (http://www.wangafu.net/~nickm/libevent-book/Ref1_libsetup.html <http://www.wangafu.net/%7Enickm/libevent-book/Ref1_libsetup.html> specifically that section about âLocks and threadingâ)??? How about event_base? lock event_base similar to bufferevents?I think that basic bufferevents locks must be enough (pthread on linux/some stuff on win32), since std::thread is not about this, IOW it is safe to synchronize via pthread's locks between them. Thanks Azat. But I am still confused about how should I use the lock. In the documentation, there are related APIs about Lock : evthread_use_pthreads(void): http://www.wangafu.net/~nickm/libevent-book/Ref1_libsetup.html: see locking and threading And you can also use the API for evbuffer: evbuffer_enable_locking(evbuffer, null): http://www.wangafu.net/~nickm/libevent-book/Ref7_evbuffer.html: see Evbuffer and Thread-safety. What's the relationship between these two APIs. Before useing evbuffer_enable_locking(), should I first call evthread_use_pthreads(void)? What's best way I use them? There is no example. I don't know how. *********************************************************************** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe libevent-users in the body. |