On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 15:38 +0000, Peter Hendrickson wrote: > I think now is a good time to switch over to a secure mix algorithm. > Nick Mathewson agreed with this suggestion and asked me to announce > that it has his blessing. pboxlevel3 (0.0.7.1) switched 22:00 GMT 27/2/2002 Thera are no problem of compatability with node with different algorithm? Ciao. Marco > I've switched wiredyne over to what looks like the most serious mix: > > # (3. A BinomialDynamicPool mix is a randomized version of DynamicPool. > > # When a DynamicPool mix would send P of N messages, a > > # BinomalDynamicPool mix sends each message with probability P/N.) > > # > > MixAlgorithm: BinomialDynamicPool > > MixInterval: 30 minutes > > MixPoolRate: 50% > > MixPoolMinSize: 5 > > Using real mixes will give us a better feel for the performance of the > real system. It will also provide a real security service, modulo the > software being in alpha. > > Peter -- +--------------- http://www.winstonsmith.info ---------------+ | il Progetto Winston Smith: scolleghiamo il Grande Fratello | | the Winston Smith Project: unplug the Big Brother | | Marco A. Calamari marcoc@xxxxxxxxx http://www.marcoc.it | | DSS/DH: 8F3E 5BAE 906F B416 9242 1C10 8661 24A9 BFCE 822B | + PGP RSA: ED84 3839 6C4D 3FFE 389F 209E 3128 5698 ----------+
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part