Re: TOR and non-contineous internet connections

To: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: TOR and non-contineous internet connections
From: "Florian D." <flockmock@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:16:56 +0100
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 14:17:07 -0500
In-reply-to: <4777E938.9070508@xxxxxx>
References: <4777C084.4030208@xxxxxxxxx> <4777E2FB.2000204@xxxxxxxxx> <4777E45F.3000409@xxxxxxxxxx> <4777E938.9070508@xxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071117)

9teen wrote:
> But bridge-relays or non-exit nodes are also fine and and help the TOR
> network as well.
ok, thx for the answers, will do that.

References:
- TOR and non-contineous internet connections
  - From: Florian D.
- Re: TOR and non-contineous internet connections
  - From: Alexander W. Janssen
- Re: TOR and non-contineous internet connections
  - From: Georg Sluyterman
- Re: TOR and non-contineous internet connections
  - From: 9teen