On 12/28/2009 12:18 PM, Andrew Lewman wrote: > On 12/28/2009 12:38 PM, Programmer In Training wrote: >>> What happens if you set the http fields to 127.0.0.1:8118 >>> <http://127.0.0.1:8118>, and the SOCKS field to 127.0.0.1:9050 >> >> I get all kinds of weird problems. The RSS poller acts up, connections >> time out or not randomly, etc. OTOH, I have little to no problems >> (except subscribing to or clicking on anything contained within RSS feed >> that is available on the web page in question) with multiple field >> settings in FF 3.6b4. Those problems aren't critical to my use of Tor >> with FF though. > > I'm going to create a vm and load up tb3 to see what issues arise. It > may be that much like firefox, the tb socks support is lacking. I can recreate the issues I'm having and then screen-cap the setting I was using, if you think that would help. >>> Isn't Thunderbird known to be a `leaky' client? Of course, with a new >>> version, its behaviour may have changed; but I was under the impression >>> that it occasionally included the system's true IP address, hostname, or >>> other identifying details in outgoing messages, or in communication with >>> a mailserver. Can anyone confirm or deny this? Also, are extensions' <snip> > easier to write a scrubbing smtp proxy that can cleanse your emails > before being delivered to a mail server. I'd use such a program in association with Vidalia, but I might have some issues since I use GPG to sign all outgoing mail. Which reminds me, I need to set up GPG to use Tor when looking up keys.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature