Re: Tor speed

[slush <slush@xxxxxxxx>]

I tried wget test now and Im confused a little bit.

------
me@computer:~$ export http_proxy=http://localhost:8118
me@computer:~$ wget http://releases.ubuntu.com/8.10/ubuntu-8.10-desktop-i386.iso
--2009-02-13 15:06:10--  http://releases.ubuntu.com/8.10/ubuntu-8.10-desktop-i386.iso
Překládám localhost… 127.0.0.1
Navazuje se spojení s localhost|127.0.0.1|:8118… spojeno.
Proxy požadavek odeslán, program čeká na odpověď… 200 OK
Délka: 732766208 (699M) [application/x-iso9660-image]
Ukládám do: „ubuntu-8.10-desktop-i386.iso.3".

 0% [                                                                  ] 1 925 103      424K/s    

--------

It received first bytes after ~ 4 seconds and run for 420kB/s. It is probably plot against my person, because I never had so good results :-).

Nodes I used: kallio, Bellum, bach

It is probably just luck, that these nodes are free now. Do you agree that this is not typical case, right?

Marek

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:59 PM, slush <slush@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Well, Firefox rendes HTML as fast as it is possible (instead of IE6), so I dont think it is the reason. You can also try wget or something - it takes hell long time to receive first byte of response and then it is fast enough.

Original question was very simple: Where is the main difference between Tor and JAP design, that JAP is spreading bandwidth much better than Tor?

Thanks,
Marek