[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [school-discuss] health issues coupled with interactive classroom display technology



Daniel,
 
Since I'm allergic to just about everything on this planet, I'm a germ freak in a way and could relate to your inquiries.  Reading your post made me laugh a little (no offense).  I found this article that might be of some interest about germs in the classroom.
 
http://content.scholastic.com/browse/article.jsp?id=8133
 
Classroom Germs

They're everywhere! We found the top ten virus and bacteria facts that teachers have to know (even if you don't want to).

1) Top spot for classroom viral presence: student desktop [1]

2) Top spot for bacteria presence: water fountain toggle [1]

3) Most germy job: teacher (Are we surprised?) [1]

4) Germs build up throughout the day. By the afternoon, 50% of classroom surfaces have the flu virus. [1]

5) Teacher illness-related absences average 5.3
days a year. [2]

6) 622 million school days are lost each year in the US due to the common cold. [3]

7) The cold season starts in late August and lasts until April. [3]

8) Forty percent of parents have sent a child to school sick. [4]

9) Seventy-four percent of teachers believe they have missed school because of illnesses picked up from their students. [5]

10) Germs can survive on surfaces for up to 72 hours! [1]

Sources: [1] Study by Charles P. Gerba, University of Arizona, 2005; [2] It's a Snap, Clean Hands Statistics, [3] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [4] June 2006 Clorox Survey, [5] 2005 Scholastic.com survey



 
On 1/8/08, Daniel Howard <dhhoward@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
As I watched the US primary election results on CNN, complete with
multi-finger touch-screen geographical displays, I began to think about
the health issues associated with various interactive technologies in
elementary schools.  If a flat panel, touch-screen display was at the
front of the class, seems like it would be a great way for viruses to
propagate, unless teachers had to wipe down the touch-screen every time
a new student came up.  Likewise, if the hand-held markers used by
commercial interactive whiteboard companies, or indeed by any
whiteboard, are shared by all students, there's another way for viruses
to propagate.  If, on the other hand, a hand-held IR pen or whiteboard
marker was cheap enough so that all students could have their own, it
would go a long way to reducing a virus propagation mechanism...I think.

Am I way out in left field here?  Does it make sense to evaluate
classroom technology in terms of health issues?

Just curious in Atlanta,
Daniel

--
Daniel Howard
President and CEO
Georgia Open Source Education Foundation